Charis, Xenia, Philia
Before I do some close reading of the text of the
Hecuba, I want to explicate some cultural and historical context about Greek
social customs.
All the characters in the play are linked by a web of obligations and favors.
Odysseus is in debt to Hecuba, who saved his life (239-50). Polymestor, out of
friendship with Priam, agreed to take care of Polydorus and to safeguard his
gold (4-12); Agamemnon receives Cassandra’s sexual ‘favors’, which, according
to Hecuba, puts him under the obligation of helping Cassandra’s family
(824-35). The text describes these links of obligation in using terminology
that was standard in Greek culture: Xenia “guest-friendship”, Philia
“friendship or family relation” and Charis “favor.”
In the Hecuba, Euripides explores the cultural norms
of Xenia “guest-friendship” and Philia “friendship or family relation”.". Utilitarian or commercial calculation of advantages and disadvantages
is ideally banned from xenia or philia relationships. No quid pro quo, no
cost/benefit analysis, just hospitality and kindness, bound by Zeus. Of course,
humans often disappoint such expectations, hence tragedy. Hecuba is at the
center of a web of relations with Odysseus, Polyxena, Agamemnon and Polymestor.
In this tragedy, the expectations of reciprocity
conspicuously and repeatedly fail: the war destroys the links of aristocratic
obligation and forces Hecuba to employ new and unexpected ways to enact her shocking revenge.
Hecuba expects Odysseus to conform to the aristocratic
values of reciprocity. When she meets him, she asks him to return a favor
(charis); she spared his life when he secretly entered Troy as a spy. She also
adds that Greek law forbids the killing of slaves. Instead of explaining why
this law does not apply in war, Odysseus focuses on his willingness to repay
Hecuba with exactly the same favor: he will spare her life if she wants
(301-2), but cannot spare Polyxena’s because it has been demanded by the ghost
of Achilles. Honoring their war dead comes first for the Greeks before other
considerations. Odysseus stresses both
aristocratic and civic values, in contrast to Hecuba, who focuses on only
obligations which link aristocrats belonging to different communities.
Polyxena
defiantly proclaims her allegiance to aristocratic values, to the point of
self-annihilation. In particular, she rejects the possibility that she will
become an object of commercial exchange, she who was “worthy of princes” (366)
will not tolerate to be sold for a piece of silver (360) and given as wife to a
servant bought “somewhere or other.” (365). 11
Polyxena points out to her mother that any attempt to
resist the violence of the Greeks simply invites more violence(405-8). She thus
manages to preserve part of her status
precisely by persuading the Greeks that she has willingly chosen the fate that
they were trying to impose on her.
So, tomorrow:
Dialogue
between Odysseus, Hecuba and Polyxena, 216-443
I have chosen this
scene for close reading partly because this is one of the earliest scenes in
Greek tragedy where three actors actually engage in a three-way conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment