Total Pageviews

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Day 8: Euripides the Posthumously Popular Avant-Garde Composer


Euripides the Posthumously Popular Avant-Garde Composer
The latter decades of the fifth century saw marked changes in musical sounds, practices, and contexts of performance. Contemporary observers, as well as later conservative critics such as Plato, characterized the changes as a musical revolution. The theatrical genres of dithyramb and tragedy were the focus of the stylistic changes that we now refer to as the “New Music,” and Euripides, along with Agathon and the notorious musician Timotheus of Miletus were its foremost advocates and practitioners.
An anecdote in Satyrus’ Life of Euripides attests to a professional association of Euripides with Timotheus :“When Timotheus was [being scorned } by the Greeks for his musical innovation and was so deeply dispirited that he had decided to kill himself, Rip alone ridiculed the audiences in turn, and perceiving how great a composer Timotheus was in his sphere of art, he encouraged him with the most reassuring words and even collaborated with him in composing the prelude to his “The Persians” with the result that Timotheus took the prize and ceased to be rejected. The account may be biographically unreliable----Euripides’ relationship with Tim may have even been one of rivalry rather than cooperation---but the story indicates the way that the two avant-garde practitioners were linked in popular imagination.
The penchant for novelty so strikingly demonstrated by Euripides in his verbal style, meters, and plots extended to the music he composed for his tragedies.  This is confirmed by the evidence of Aristophanes, who throughout his comedies engages in ceaseless poetic rivalry with Rip, parodying, imitating, and citing his scenarios, plots and expressions ( the comic poet Cadmus  euripidaristophanizein, “to Euripid-Aristophanize” to characterize the verbal virtuosity evident in both poets.)
Aristophanes’ comic parody of Euripides extended to imitation and critiquing his perceived musical excesses. In Frogs of 405 BC Aristophanes put “Euripides” onstage I the underworld ( he had recently died in Macedon) competing with Aeschylus for the prize of tragedy, judged by Dionysus in his comic incarnation. In a passage in which “Aeschylus” contrasts his own decourous musical practices with those of “Rip” the main criticism he levels at his rival is that he is indiscriminate in the way he mixes high and low genres of song:
This fellow takes his material from all over: whore songs,
Drinking songs by Meletus, Carian pipe tunes,
Dirges and dances. I’ll demonstreate it soon enough---
Someone bring my lyre! Mind you,  who needs
A lyre for this? Where’s that woman with the potsherds,
The one who plays on them. Oh Muse of Euripides, come here.
You’re the right person to sing these songs! ( Frogs 1301-1307.)
There is plenty of later evidence on the music of Euripides being, like his plays, more popular after his death then during his lifetime. There is that famous story, related in Plutarch’s Life of Nicias, how knowledge of Euripidean lyric was instrumental in effecting the release from slavery of Greek prisoners in Sicily; how starving soldiers received food and drink in exchange for singing what songs of his they knew; how the Caunians allowed a ship pursued by pirates to harbour in their port after finding out that the men on board were well versed in Euripidean ἄιcματα (cf. Plut. Nic. 29.2-3). Whether or not all this is true it would be impossible to say. But the popular appeal of his songs is unquestionably confirmed by papyri containing the remains of Hellenistic anthologies of Euripidean lyrics and references to ‘concert performances’ of his songs in non-theatrical contexts.
 Pseudo-Psellus On Tragedy 5.39 provides the following account of how Euripidean melody diverged technically from that of earlier tragedians: “The music of early tragedy uses the unmixed enharmonic genus and a genus created by mixing the enharmonic and diatonic genera, but none of the tragedians until Euripides appears to have made use of the chromatic genus. The character of this genus is soft.” We aren’t sure what he means by “soft.”
Of the modes (tonoi) ancient tragedy mainly uses what they called the Dorian and Mixolydian the former because it is suited to solemnity  the latter because it is associated with mourning ( See my earlier blog post, Lament 101. But tragedy also used the so-called free or loose modes (harmoniai) the Ionian and “the free Lydian.” Euripides seems to have been the first to use a large range of notes and wide interval skips: this style of music was called “gapped” by ancient musicians. Think Eric Dolphy if he played an aulos.
          The modes were in simple terms,  systems of tuning analogous to modern scales, although special modes were thought to have almost ethical effects. The so called “genera” modified the effects of these “scales,” altering the pattern of intervals, like harmonic versus melodic minor. So what did they mean by enharmonic, diatonic and chromatic?  The enharmonic, which was considered the oldest and “original” genus, made use of fine pitch differences ( i.e. quarter-tones). Toward the end of the 5th century  music composed in this style was considered increasingly old-fashioned, and was giving way to melodies created with less subtle half-tones (for the chromatic genus) and whole tones (the diatonic genus) . The diatonic genus was felt to impart a “sweeter” sound  that was heard as gratifying to vulgar tastes. The manner in which modulation (changing keys, modes, etc.) employed by Eurpides and Timotheus also appears to have been, or been felt as, considerably more unrestrained than  earlier composers.
Performances of classical tragedies were musical events more akin to a modern opera or musical than to a theater play. The inherent metricality of the ancient Greek language gives rhythm a special claim to importance when considering ancient music. The allusions to music and to musical instruments lend a number of the choral passages in which they occur a self-referential quality, sometimes with unmistakable implications for the song's performance. A much-debated question in Greek musical scholarship has been the question of how and to what extent the melodic shape was dictated or influenced by the pitch accents intrinsic to the pronunciation of Greek words. Greek music found on papyri and inscriptions dating from the third century BCE on exhibit a high degree of correspondence between melody and pitch accent, and evidence from other pitched languages show that correspondence of this kind is not uncommon.

            Next: Rip rapped in iambic trimeter, but wrote songs in meters appropriate to the emotions being expressed by his characters. Try typing TRIMETER without spell correction making it into TRIMESTER.


No comments: